Real Estate Transactions and Finance

February 10, 2017

Untimely Deaths- The Legal Aspects

The timing of death is never particularly welcome. Some families are prepared, in that the deceased was elderly, maybe ill, and living in a nursing home. Perhaps such a person also had the foresight to have their attorney prepare her Will and other estate documents. Others may pass away at a relatively young age, in the prime of life, with ongoing financial and personal activities. This post will examine the legal ramifications of passing away while a legal matter is pending.

Imagine that the deceased was a party to a contract concerning the sale of a house which has not yet closed. The first step that the survivors would need to undertake is to review the contract and determine if it addresses the potential death of one of the parties before the closing. In most cases, the seller is bound to the terms of the contract through her successors. This means that the survivors cannot decide to nullify the contract and move into the house. However, the seller is not available to conclude the transaction. The attorney for the seller would need to apply to the Surrogate’s Court to apply for Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration , which appoints the appropriate fiduciary to act for the Estate in order to complete the closing. Should circumstances warrant, it may be prudent to apply for Preliminary Letters Testamentary or Preliminary Letters of Administration, to permit the sale to conclude if it is jeopardized by a continued delay.

If the deceased was the potential purchaser of the house, the contract is likely to allow the purchaser’s survivors to cancel the contract. This is a logical result, as the transaction is inherently dependent upon the purchaser maintaining a job in order to pay the mortgage and other carrying costs of the house. Forcing this transaction to conclusion is a cruel result. In most cases, the downpayment is refundable. However, some contracts only provide that half or none of the downpayment would be refunded. It is advisable to have your attorney negotiate a favorable disposition for the downpayment in this instance when representing a purchaser, even if he is a young person.

December 8, 2016

Due Diligence and Real Estate Purchases

By Weiss & Weiss

You have found the perfect house, cooperative or condominium apartment after a long search. It has the ideal updated kitchen to show off your culinary skills and a beautiful bathroom that rivals a spa-like retreat. Is there anything that should delay the signing of the contract and procession to closing? Yes, there is. A prudent purchaser needs to conduct the appropriate due diligence to make sure that the property and surrounding neighborhood is financially and physically sound. Otherwise, the purchaser may acquire a property that is a long-term headache and difficult to sell when desired.

First, an inspection should be conducted by a professional engineer when buying a house. Some condominium and cooperative purchasers also find it appropriate to conduct an inspection. For a house, such an inspection may reveal a serious condition, such as a crack in the foundation. In this case, the buyer may want to search for another property. An inspection may also show items that the buyer will want to monitor once she is a homeowner. For instance, if the inspection predicts that the remaining useful life of the roof or the hot water heater is going to be five years, the homeowner may want to budget for such replacement and should not be surprised if these elements need replacement at such time. The inspection may also list items that your attorney may wish to request for inclusion while negotiating your contract. The seller may agree to repair the dishwasher, replace a broken smoke detector and the like prior to closing.

Inspections when purchasing a foreclosed property serve another purpose. Although properties offered for sale after foreclosure are generally strictly “as is”, inspection results that are unsatisfactory to the buyer may allow the buyer to cancel the contract or present the opportunity to ask the seller to remedy a particular condition or offer a price reduction. In any case, the buyer will have knowledge as to the condition and the expectations going forward.

November 3, 2016

Pitfalls Arising from the Purchase of Foreclosed Properties

By Weiss & Weiss

From time to time, we are approached by a client who says that she is getting a bargain on a real estate purchase of a foreclosed property. Such a property is being sold by the lender or its subsidiary at a price that the client believes to be well below market. The client may wish to flip the property or use it for his own occupancy. It is important at this stage to hire an attorney with an expertise in this area to protect your interests.

Like other properties, foreclosed properties are usually marketed by a real estate broker. However, most accepted offers for foreclosed properties are without some conditions that are favorable to the buyer. It is not unusual for the buyer to be pressured to sign the first draft of the contract immediately, provide proof of funds and a bank check for the downpayment. Once our firm is engaged in such a transaction , we evaluate the contract and negotiate it as appropriate for this type of sale.

Buying a foreclosed property does not afford the purchaser some of the standard contract terms as in a transaction with a seller who lives in the property. For instance, the property is sold “as is”, without representation that the appliances and major building systems are in working order. Contracts for foreclosed properties often contain time of the essence closing dates and may require the buyer to pay all adjustments for real estate taxes as of the time of the essence closing date, even if such date is not the actual closing date. Also, offers are often accepted in a bidding process, without the buyer having the opportunity to go inside the house or have a formal professional inspection performed. A buyer may not even receive keys at the closing, much less go inside prior to closing, in some of the tougher transactions.

September 22, 2016

Inheritance of Real Property and Partition Actions

By Weiss & Weiss

Our firm is often consulted in situations where a number of individuals have inherited real property. For example, a parent passes away, and leaves a house to her three children. Many legal issues can arise from this type of situation, which will be discussed in this blog post.

The first question when a property owner dies is whether they have a written will. If they do, then their Last Will and Testament should direct the disposition of the said property. For example, the Will may state “I leave my property located at (address) to my three children (names of children). Another possibility is that the property is not specifically addressed, but the testator (the person making the Will), simply leaves all of their property owned at time of death jointly to their children.

If the person dies without a Will (intestate), then the disposition of their property, including any real property, is made pursuant to New York Estate Law. For example, if a person passes away without a Will, and has no living spouse or parents, then their property would be inherited by her living children.

September 15, 2016

Everything You Need to Know About the Cooperative Board Approval Process (But Were Afraid to Ask)

By Weiss & Weiss

After a long search, you have finally located your dream apartment. In New York, such an apartment is likely to be a cooperative apartment. You have been fortunate enough to obtain your loan commitment. Are you ready to close? No, because you now need approval for your purchase from the board of the cooperative. Such a condition is contained in the form contract for cooperative purchases. This post will discuss what is entailed in obtaining cooperative board approval.

The contract will specify a timeframe for the submission of your board application package. Your attorney should monitor this deadline, along with other deadlines to confirm that you have made the submission within the proper timeframe. It is preferable to work with a professional real estate agent who is familiar with the building or its managing agent, so that the board package is prepared in a manner pleasing to the board. Typical items for submission include financial records such as bank statements, and personal and professional letters of reference, along with the completed board application and credit check authorization. Each building specifies the number of copies required to be submitted. Most buildings will require that the application not be submitted unless it is also accompanied by a loan commitment letter from your lender.

The managing agent will review the application with the building’s interview committee (usually a smaller portion of the board). If such application on its face is not acceptable to the board (usually for financial reasons), they will decline to interview the candidate. This is a wise move, so that the board is not accused of discrimination in the event that the applicant happens to be a member of a protected class, which is not discoverable unless the applicant is met face-to-face. Otherwise, the board will schedule the interview. Potentially during the summer months or holiday season, meetings may occur more sporatically.

July 28, 2016

The Implementation of the New Mortgage Closing Disclosure Rules-How’s it Going?

By Weiss & Weiss

In a prior post , we alerted our readers that the HUD real estate closing form as they knew it would be disappearing from closings. In a later post , we informed our readers that the new loan closing disclosure rules were in effect. Several months after the implementation of these rules, we would like to share with you our observations of how clients have been dealing with these new rules.

Fortunately, we have experienced a busy home transaction season. On the flip side, we have observed that transactions are closing approximately one month later than they did prior to the implementation of these new rules. The exception to later closings is when a transaction is all cash, which does not require these disclosure documents and the mandatory waiting periods involved. Longer closing timeframes are a result of lenders taking longer to issue the loan commitment, evaluate collateral, and clear the loan to close. Even if the buyer and seller are ready and anxious to close, the lenders have been disregarding the will of the parties because they can incur substantial fines for failure to provide timely disclosures under the new regulations. Lenders may also need to refund money to borrowers if the closing costs are higher than were disclosed. The mandatory disclosure timeframe can be shortened in rare circumstances, such as an actual emergency. An emergency is not that a buyer is going to have a baby imminently and wants to get settled, but is when a buyer may lose her downpayment by needing to react to a time of the essence closing notice or if the property is about to miss a short sale closing deadline .

Lenders have become much more inconsistent and conservative in recent months. We have found that most lenders are internally deciding to require disclosure timeframes that are longer than required by law. We have noted that one regional lender has required that even more time pass than required than a major national lender that is complying with the law. A lender that is open for business on Saturday may seem to get the parties to closing faster because it can count Saturday as one of the disclosure days.

June 23, 2016

House Rentals and their Effect on House Sales in New York

By Weiss & Weiss

Recent posts on this blog have discussed legal issues relating to house rentals in New York. Many of our clients have second houses, vacation homes, or multiple properties which they rent to tenants. This post will discuss legal issues that arise when an owner seeks to sell a property that is currently being rented to a tenant.

The first issue which may arise relates to access to the property in question for potential buyers. We advise that any house lease contain a clause that allows the landlord (and their agents) reasonable access to the property to show it to possible buyers. This will allow the property to be shown to third parties during the tenancy in question. Another issue that will arise is ensuring that the tenant keep the property in good repair. Again, the lease with the tenant should contain a clause relating to the tenant’s obligations in maintaining the property. This may include using the same vendors which the owner/landlord currently uses. We also advise that an experienced attorney draft specific provisions relating to the tenant’s obligations concerning the conditions of the house, such as the vendors to be used for outside maintenance, roof and gutters, and repairs to appliances.

Of course, the tenant should be advised by the landlord that the property may be sold. Some leases may contain clauses allowing the tenant to purchase the property, either at a set price or “at a price to be agreed to between the parties.” The problem with the latter clause is that if the parties cannot agree on a price, then there will be no purchase. We would advise using a specific amount in any such purchase option clause, but also having a specific date by which the tenant must exercise their option to purchase. Then, if the option is not exercised, it will lapse and be of no further effect.

June 16, 2016

Waiving the Mortgage Contingency Clause- Should Purchasers in New York Take the Risk?

By Weiss & Weiss

Sellers of real estate in New York perceive the current market as one with a tight inventory for desirable properties. In such a market, multiple offers may be available to a seller. In order to select one offer over another, a seller may demand that the buyer who intends to obtain a mortgage waive the standard mortgage contingency clause in the proposed contract. This post will discuss whether waiving the mortgage contingency is a risk that a buyer should take.

In a typical New York real estate contract, various contingencies (conditions) need to be met between signing the contract and closing. Some of the conditions usually include proof of clear title, a satisfactory appraisal , approval of the finances of the cooperative building and the like. If the conditions are not met, the downpayment will be delivered to the seller or the buyer, depending on the circumstances.

A mortgage contingency clause works as follows. After the contract is signed, the buyer is afforded a particular number of days to obtain their loan approval. If the buyer does not obtain the loan, he can show that the loan was declined and request the refund of the downpayment. During this period of time, the seller is required to remove the property from the market and is relying upon this particular buyer to close. If the buyer has a valid legal right to cancel the contract and receive the return of his downpayment, the seller has lost potentially two months in being able to market the property again. In New York, missing an opportunity to market the property during the Spring and Summer seasons could cause the property to be overlooked by buyers until the following Spring, because most contracts are signed in the Spring and Summer months.

June 7, 2016

Deficiency Judgments in New York Foreclosures

By Weiss & Weiss

Previous blog posts have discussed foreclosures in New York State. Many of our clients own either residential or commercial property and may not be able to make their mortgage payments. They may become subject to a foreclosure lawsuit brought in the appropriate Supreme Court, in which the lender seeks to foreclose on its mortgage and take over ownership of the property in question.

However, our firm is often asked what happens after the lender takes ownership of the property from the borrower. This is usually done after a public foreclosure sale of the property before a court-appointed Referee. The Referee will then prepare a Referee’s Deed, in which ownership of the property is transferred from the borrower to the entity which was the successful high bidder at the foreclosure sale. The Referee’s Deed is then recorded with the County Clerk’s Office in the county in which the property is located.

Does the foreclosure action end at that point? Generally the answer is yes, but not always. The lender, which can be either an institution such as a bank or credit union, or an individual, may seek a deficiency judgment against the borrower after the foreclosure sale is finished. Whether this happens is dependent on the successful bidder at the foreclosure sale. Before the public auction, the lender will make public the amount which the borrower owes on the property. This amount will include all principal and interest on the loan being foreclosed, the costs of the foreclosure, including attorney’s and referee’s fees and court costs, as well as any other expenses that the lender incurred in foreclosing the property. Let’s assume that this amount is $500,000.00. Any third-party bidder (anyone who is not the lender) for the property must bid at least this amount for the property. In the example given, the bidding would have to start at $500,000.00. Assuming someone believes the property is worth at least this amount, the highest bid which exceeds $500,000.00 would pay this amount to the Referee and become the owner of the property. The first $500,000.00 of the successful bid would be paid to the lender, with any remaining sums going to any creditors of the borrower who have appeared in the foreclosure action, and any surplus after that paid to the borrower. In such a case, there would be no deficiency judgment.

May 19, 2016

Who’s in Charge? Disputes over Control of Religious Institutions

By Weiss & Weiss

Recently in the news is a story relating to control over Touro Synagogue, located in Newport, Rhode Island. The Touro Synagogue was built prior to the Revolutionary War and is one of the oldest congregations in the United States. As with many older institutions, over the centuries, the original congregation and their descendants eventually moved from the area in question. Many of these individuals settled in New York, and formed a new congregation, named Shearith Israel. The original congregation in Rhode Island dwindled and even fell dormant for a period of time.

According to the Court records, there is a dispute between the current congregation of Touro Synagogue, now named Jeshuat Israel, and the New York congregation, Shearith Israel, over who was the rightful owner of the Touro Synagogue, and who has the right to make decisions such as the sale of ornaments in order to raise funds.

Our firm has handled similar cases involving control over religious institutions. Many churches and synagogues experience changing congregations and conditions over a long period of time. Depending on the location of the institution, members may move from the area, causing a sharp decrease in active membership. At that point, the institution must decide whether to continue in its present location, or consider moving to another part of the New York where membership may increase. Moving an institution will usually involve the sale of the current location. Such a sale must be approved by the Board of Trustees or other governing body of the institution in question. Prior blog posts have discussed the handling of legal disputes relating to control over a religious corporation.