Real Estate Transactions and Finance

June 7, 2013

Title is Vital

title insurance.jpg Real estate transactions commonly involve the inclusion of title insurance policies. For the purposes of this blog post, we will be discussing title insurance obtained when a person purchases a house. Title insurance is a unique type of insurance, in that the events that are to be covered have already occurred. For instance, an automobile policy covers loss resulting from an accident that could happen after the policy is bound. On the other hand, title insurance covers acts that have already happened but not discovered prior to closing, such as a fraudulent deed in the chain of title.

Attorneys who practice real estate law rely upon title insurance companies and their examiners to identify problems with a particular property. Our firm maintains relationships with the major title insurance companies in our region and determines the most appropriate company to use for particular clients. Title companies also play an important role in reviewing closing documents such as Powers of Attorney to confirm that they are valid and in proper form to record. Ideally, title examiners do not miss documents recorded against a property, such as open mortgages that need to be satisfied as of closing. If the title examiner failed to locate a recorded mortgage or if the seller intentionally or inadvertently misled the parties as to the existence of a mortgage, the title insurance company is generally legally obligated to pay the claim for loss suffered by the purchaser (and its lender) because the mortgage lien was not paid and removed as of closing.

At the request of the purchaser’s attorney , title companies can provide enhanced coverage in certain situations. For instance, by paying a slightly higher premium at closing, the purchaser can obtain a “market value rider” to the policy. This rider provides that the policy coverage limit will inflate to the future market value of the property, regardless of the amount that the purchaser paid at the closing for the property. Generally, a property sold by a real estate broker to an unaffiliated purchaser reflects market value, making the purchase of the market value rider unnecessary to a purchaser looking for prudent means to reduce closing costs. However, if a property is acquired through foreclosure, an estate or through a seller who was not introduced by a real estate broker, the price paid at closing may be well below market value, making the purchase of the market value rider an intelligent move.

May 3, 2013

Bundled Services For Real Estate Purchases- Do They Benefit Purchasers?

By Weiss & Weiss

Bundled services have commonly been offered to purchasers of real estate in New York. For example, a real estate broker, wishing to enhance an affiliated title insurance company, has a program that encourages attorneys to refer their title business to the title company. A title agent provides tax reduction services as a benefit to its title customers. Mortgage providers may have an affiliation with a real estate broker. Purchasers may consider bundled services to be convenient and beneficial. They may be unfamiliar with the community in which they are purchasing or new to the process, giving them the tendency to trust recommendations of professionals that they have already selected. However, in some cases, bundled services predominantly benefit those entities to which the referral is made and do not necessarily result in better or less expensive service for the customer.

Title insurance companies are highly competitive entities that have fewer transactions to close since the “Great Recession”. In an effort to stand out among their competitors, it is not unusual for a title company to have an affiliated mortgage loan provider or title insurance company. They argue that closing issues can be resolved more readily since the servicers are constantly working with one another. Real estate brokers want to make sure that their purchaser can obtain financing, so referring to their affiliated entity is perceived by some as making the issuance of a loan commitment more likely. In some cases, they attempt to bring attorneys, who they select to be on an “approved list”, into the arrangement. Purchasers should be aware that in order to be on the “approved list”, an attorney may be requested to refer its title business to a particular entity on substantially all of his or her transactions, even those that did not result from the real estate broker with the affiliated title business.

Some title insurance companies that have lost transactions from attorneys on approved lists with other title companies are crying foul to this arrangement. They argue that the deck is stacked against them, in that the title company is in effect selected before the contract is even signed. While the real interest in the complaints may be to stifle the competition, there are legitimate reasons for some of the objections. New York’s Insurance Law provides that those who accept or receive a quid pro quo are subject to financial penalty. Title companies have been forbidden from providing goods of value as an inducement for future business. Expensive gifts and tickets to sporting events are of concern. Financial inducements (kickbacks) are prohibited. Invitations to continuing education events and office supplies are not considered an inducement for business. It is not unusual to refer business in any field to a golfing buddy, but if the service is deficient or too expensive, it only benefits the person who wants to keep playing golf, rather than the purchaser.

March 22, 2013

Corporations and Partnerships: Their Legal Effects

By Weiss & Weiss

Our firm is often asked by clients who are purchasing real estate or starting a business what type of legal entity, if any, they should form to protect their interests. In order to insulate an individual from personal liability, a corporate or partnership should be formed. In addition, within these categories, there are subcategories, such as limited liability companies (“LLC”) and limited liability partnerships (“LLP”). This post will discuss the basic qualities of such entities, as well as the legal effect that they have on their individual shareholders and partners.

According to New York State, a limited liability company (LLC) is an unincorporated business organization of one or more persons who have limited liability for the contractual obligations and other liabilities of the business. It combines corporation-style limited liability with partnership-style flexibility. The owners of an LLC are called “members” rather than shareholders or partners. A member may be an individual, a corporation, a partnership, another limited liability company, or any other legal entity. A managing member is to be designated when this type of entity is formed.

Forming an LLC will generally be more expensive than forming a New York corporation. This is because an LLC, upon formation, has a legal obligation to publish a statement of its formation in a publication ordered by the New York Department of State. The cost of such advertisement usually makes the cost of forming an LLC greater than the cost of forming a standard business corporation. An LLC has no restrictions on what it may own, so it can hold legal title to real estate or any other type of property. The members of an LLC are not personally liable for the debts and obligations of the LLC.

March 1, 2013

Beware of Persons Engaging in the Unauthorized Practice of Law

By Weiss & Weiss

Our readers should be wary of persons who may be engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. This issue is defined as a non-lawyer rendering legal advice or drafting legal documents. Section 478 of New York’s Judiciary Law declares that it is unlawful to practice or appear as an attorney for another person, to render legal services or hold oneself out to the public as entitled to practice law, without being duly licensed and admitted to practice law. This blog post will define the unauthorized practice of law, discuss New York laws pertaining to same and describe situations that our readers should avoid.

Common situations comprising the unauthorized practice of law include the following. A real estate broker drafts a contract, lease or mortgage. A “loan modification expert,” claiming to be an attorney, negotiates with a lender and then advises the borrower to enter into a loan modification. A client or customer dealing with such persons should be especially concerned if they are told that the transaction is on the “fast track,” that there is “no time” to consult an attorney and that they are advising them as an attorney. Another red flag is the person’s self- interest. A real estate broker wants to get the deal done to earn his commission and will encourage a simple contract to be signed without attorney objections, which objections may be validly protective of the client.

Real estate brokers and agents are subject to the loss of their license for the unauthorized practice of law. Article 12-A of New York’s Real Property Law governs the licensing requirements of real estate brokers and salespersons. This Article contains the provision requiring real estate brokers and agents to be licensed and the procedure for the potential revocation of their license. The New York Attorney General’s Office prosecutes criminal actions for violations of said Article. In addition, the New York Department of State accepts complaints against licensed brokers and conducts investigations accordingly. Brokers are vulnerable to claims involving the unauthorized practice of law if they draft any document pertaining to real estate such as a contract, lease, mortgage or deed, especially if they are paid to do so. However, if they use one of the forms approved by the bar association or local brokerage association in the county in which they are located, including only ministerial terms such as name, date, property address, they will not be subject to claims of unauthorized practice of law; particularly if they note in boldface type that the document is subject to review by each party’s attorney.

February 22, 2013

Legal Requirements for the Sale, Mortgage and Lease of Properties Owned by New York Religious Corporations

By Weiss & Weiss

Often the most significant asset owned by a religious corporation such as a church, synagogue or mosque in New York is real estate. For a variety of reasons, the religious institution may wish to sell, mortgage or lease its property. New York’s Religious Corporation Law prescribes the procedure to be followed in order to legally complete such a transaction. For the purposes of our discussion in this blog post, we will be discussing a sale by a religious corporation.

New York’s Religious Corporation Law declares that “[a] religious corporation shall not sell, mortgage or lease for a term exceeding five years any of its real property without applying for and obtaining leave of the court…”. In layman’s terms, the New York Statute requires that the religious corporation apply by Petition to the Supreme Court of the county in which the property is located for an order permitting the sale. Without the Supreme Court’s consent, the transaction will be void. The purpose of the statute is to prevent the congregational leadership from dissipating congregational assets.

Prior to submitting the Petition, we will assume that the following steps will have already occurred. The congregation must enter into a contract of sale with the party purchasing the property. The Constitution and By-Laws of the congregation will specifically detail the notice and quorum requirements for voting to approve the transaction as a congregation. Our firm will analyze the organizational documents and draft the required documents to hold the vote to approve the transaction as well as conducts the meetings where such vote takes place. In many cases, the Board of Trustees will be required to vote on the matter before the entire congregation also votes to approve the transaction. Written evidence of the congregational vote to approve the transaction will be submitted with the Petition. The Petition will describe the nature of the transaction and indicate that same was approved pursuant to the congregation’s organizational documents. Attached to the Petition will also be a Verification of the President or other lay leader of the congregation certifying the authenticity of the contents of the documents, our attorney’s Affidavit of Regularity confirming the proper procedures were followed with respect to the congregational vote and other aspects of the transaction, a Certification of Authentication of the organizational and other congregational documents submitted, and the proposed Order.

February 1, 2013

The Legal Distinctions between Cooperative and Condominium Transactions in New York

By Weiss & Weiss

apartment building.jpg New Yorkers who purchase an apartment typically buy what is known as a cooperative (“Co-op”) or condominium (“Condo”). There are important legal distinctions between a cooperative and a condominium that are notable during the purchase process and after the closing of the transaction. This blog post addresses these distinctions.

A cooperative is a corporation formed for the purposes of common ownership, where the New York State Attorney General has accepted the relevant Offering Plan for filing. An owner of a cooperative apartment owns a particular number of shares in the corporation and is also designated a proprietary lease whereby the shareholder may occupy a particular unit in the building. A condominium is also governed by an Offering Plan. However, a condominium is real property, wherein a unit owner obtains a Unit Deed identifying a particular unit to be occupied and a percentage of common interest (i.e. common areas of the building such as the lobby, hallways, roof, etc.) in the building that is owned.

Generally, cooperative boards strictly govern all resident activities, starting with the purchase of an apartment. A detailed application is usually required to be submitted to the board along with all references and financial data requested by the cooperative board, prior to attending a personal interview and obtaining board approval to the transaction. Once approved, the parties in the transaction will attend the closing at the office of the transfer agent for the cooperative to obtain the stock certificate and proprietary lease evidencing ownership of the unit. A purchaser cannot acquire the apartment without the approval and participation of the cooperative board and its transfer agent.

January 25, 2013

Boundary Issues and Their Influence on Real Estate Transactions in New York

By Weiss & Weiss

A purchaser of real estate in New York State typically has plenty to evaluate in determining whether to buy a property. Usually the evaluation is limited to the four corners enclosed by the property line. This blog post addresses the matters that are beyond the property line that should concern a buyer.

Fences can be seen enclosing many properties in New York State, but are often not within the legal property line. When a fence is erected, a property owner should have a staked survey prepared and the fence installed consistent with the property line as shown on said survey. Of course, many people do not know that surveying is a prudent means by which to install a fence or do not wish to incur this expense. As a result, many fences may be installed over another person’s property line. This may not be discovered until a neighbor attempts to sell his property and the neighbor’s buyer conducts a title search and survey, discovering that the selling party is out of possession as to a portion of his property. If the portion that is out of possession is less than six inches, most title companies will insure such an exception to coverage. If the out of possession portion is more than six inches, the selling party will need to request an affidavit from the encroaching neighbor stating that they know their fence encroaches beyond their property line and that they make no legal claim to the encroaching portion. This affidavit will allow the title company to insure as if the encroachment were less than six inches.

Should the out of possession issue not be discovered for some reason or the encroaching neighbor is not willing to sign such an affidavit, the encroaching neighbor may acquire the strip of land by operation of law under the legal principal known as adverse possession. It is not uncommon for the encroaching neighbor to request a fee to sign such an affidavit or to request an easement (right to use) the strip of land in exchange for signing any agreement. The parties to a transaction will need to determine whether it is worthwhile to agree to such terms in order for the transaction to proceed.

January 10, 2013

Legal Issues Relating to the Sale of Businesses and Professional Practices

By Weiss & Weiss

Our firm is often asked by clients to handle the purchase or sale of an ongoing business. This business may also be a professional practice, such as a pharmacy, or medical or dental office. There are many legal aspects of such a transaction, which will be discussed in this blog post.

Such transactions often involve the sale of real estate which is owned by the business being sold. For example, if a pharmacy is being sold, the building in which the pharmacy is located may be owned by the business in question. In such a situation, the sale of the real estate would be part of the transaction in which the actual business is also being sold. For tax purposes, the amount paid by the buyer should be allocated separately to both the real estate (if applicable) and business in question. A further allocation may be made with respect to fixtures and equipment that are part of the transferred items. Therefore, if the total purchase price is $600,000.00, $300,000 may be considered the price for the real estate, and $300,000.00 for the purchase of the actual business. We recommend that all parties consult their accounting professionals to determine the most favorable allocation for tax purposes.

The first legal issue relates to the legal structure of the business being purchased. If the business is an entity such as a corporation, professional corporation (P.C.) or limited liability company (LLC), the entity and its assets can be sold to another party. The first step in this process involves confirming that the corporation is in “good standing” in the State of New York. This involves checking to ensure that the entity has made all necessary filings and is current in paying its franchise taxes. A certificate of good standing should be obtained from the New York State Department of State. In addition, all corporate documentation, including the stock certificates, stock book, and corporate seal should be delivered at the time of the completion of the purchase.

January 3, 2013

New York Law Pertaining to Home Warranties

By Weiss & Weiss

Home purchasers in New York State often request warranties in connection with their home purchase. However, depending upon the type of property purchased, warranties on general construction and mechanical systems will not be obtainable. Without an express and separate warranty, any representations made in the contract of sale with respect to property condition will expire upon the delivery of the deed at closing. As such, the purchaser must generally discover all property defects prior to receiving the deed in order to expect a remedy from the seller. New York is a “caveat emptor” jurisdiction, meaning that buyers generally take title without a seller’s warranty as to condition and without recourse if the buyer discovers unacceptable conditions after the closing.

The most common warranty that is realistic for a New York real estate purchaser to obtain applies to new construction of a home to be used as the primary residence of the purchaser, who is also the first person to live in the home. In this instance, the warranty will have a monetary limit and will expire in stated periods of time depending on the type of item. A standard new home warranty will cover construction defects, flaws in the plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling and ventilation systems servicing the home and material defects. A new home warranty typically excludes appliances, which are covered by the manufacturer’s warranty. However, if the builder installed the appliances improperly, the purchaser can rightfully bring a claim under the new home warranty. A homeowner making a claim must follow the notice deadlines specified in the warranty and afford the builder an opportunity to inspect and correct the defect, as outlined in the warranty.

Most purchasers in New York acquire a home that is “used”, having already been lived in by someone else. The standard contract provision in New York states that all warranties and representations made by the seller expire upon the delivery of the deed, unless they are expressly stated to survive the delivery of the deed. This means that once the deed is delivered at the closing, the purchaser is accepting any conditions that may exist at the property. As such, the purchaser should thoroughly inspect the property immediately before the closing. Any condition that could have been discovered becomes the purchaser’s problem once the closing has concluded. In any event, a purchaser of a used home should receive the benefits of manufacturers’ warranties with respect to appliances.

December 7, 2012

Real Estate Legal Issues Relating to “Super-Storm” Sandy

By Weiss & Weiss

Uprooted Tree.jpg Recent extreme weather conditions in the New York metropolitan area have caused great hardship for many of its residents. We hope that those individuals and families who suffered damage or destruction of their residences are in the process of recovery. This blog post will discuss some of the legal issues which may arise from some of the results of the “super-storm.”

The first issue for many homeowners is when there is property damage which may be covered by their homeowner’s insurance. Most standard homeowner’s policies will pay to repair damage to a house and other physical structures located on the property caused by extreme weather conditions, with the exception of flood damage, which is covered under separate insurance policies that a homeowner may obtain. One example of this may be an uprooted tree which fell on a house and caused damage to a roof. If this occurs, the homeowner should contact their insurance agent and notify them immediately of the damage. The insurance company will then send an insurance adjuster to the property. The adjuster will survey the damage and will then estimate the amount it will take to repair the property. Repairs made before the insurance company has inspected the damages and approved of the cost to repair are unlikely to be reimbursed.

The homeowner may receive a check from their insurance company to pay for the repair work in question. However, where the property is mortgaged, the lender usually must be notified. The reason for this is that most loan documents contain clauses requiring the homeowner to keep the property in good repair and to involve the lender in the event of a casualty. If the homeowner receives a large sum of money from an insurance settlement, the lender has a vested interest in making sure these funds are applied to repair the property, and not spent by the homeowner for other purposes. Most lending documents therefore require that any insurance proceeds in excess of $10,000.00 be endorsed by both the homeowner and a representative of the lender. In practical terms, the check from the insurance company in excess of this amount will be issued to both the homeowner and the lending institution as co-payees. The homeowner must then obtain consent and a written endorsement on the check from their mortgage lender in order to deposit these funds, and must show that the funds are being used to repair the property which is the subject of the mortgage.